header-logo header-logo

20 September 2018 / Rawdon Crozier
Issue: 7809 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Home sweet home…despite the leasehold?

nlj_7809_crozier

Rawdon Crozier examines the challenges of modern leasehold conveyancing

  • Homebuyers often do not understand leasehold and the conveyancer should point out onerous terms and potential problems.

In December 2017, the ministerial foreword to ‘Tackling unfair practices in the leasehold market, summary of consultation responses and government response’ was noteworthy for its description by Sajid Javid, then Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government, of aspects of the leasehold sector as ‘… practically feudal and entirely unjustifiable’.

Whether or not the ‘feudal’ tag was intended as more than a rhetorical flourish, it was not without justification. The development of new-build leaseholds into what could be described as modern ‘fee farms’ has presented conveyancers with challenges to which, evidence suggests, they have failed to rise. This is, however, changing.

In 1995 23% of new-build registrations were leaseholds, by 2016 that figure had risen to 46%. In the same period the percentage of new-build houses sold as leaseholds had more than doubled, from 7% to 15% (worth £1.79bn in 2016). More than a fifth

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll