header-logo header-logo

29 July 2009 / Samantha Morgan , Philip Munro
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Opinion , Tax
printer mail-detail

Homeward bound?

Samantha Morgan & Philip Munro lift the lid on MPs’ taxes & expenses

The spotlight of media scrutiny has been closely applied to MPs and their expenses claims during recent weeks, following the disclosure of parliamentary expenses records to the Daily Telegraph. The political fallout from the publication of these records has been significant, leading to the suspension of MPs by their parties, announcements that some MPs will stand down at the next general election and to some MPs repaying amounts claimed. One effect of this media reporting has been to bring the tax position of MPs into focus both in respect of the income tax treatment of their expenses and the capital gains tax (CGT) position of their homes.

Before considering the tax position of MPs, it is worth noting that the tax returns of MPs are dealt with by a special HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) unit based in Cardiff known as “Public Departments 1”. MPs are considered by HMRC to be likely to have complicated tax affairs and the HMRC guidance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll