header-logo header-logo

29 July 2009 / Samantha Morgan , Philip Munro
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Opinion , Tax
printer mail-detail

Homeward bound?

Samantha Morgan & Philip Munro lift the lid on MPs’ taxes & expenses

The spotlight of media scrutiny has been closely applied to MPs and their expenses claims during recent weeks, following the disclosure of parliamentary expenses records to the Daily Telegraph. The political fallout from the publication of these records has been significant, leading to the suspension of MPs by their parties, announcements that some MPs will stand down at the next general election and to some MPs repaying amounts claimed. One effect of this media reporting has been to bring the tax position of MPs into focus both in respect of the income tax treatment of their expenses and the capital gains tax (CGT) position of their homes.

Before considering the tax position of MPs, it is worth noting that the tax returns of MPs are dealt with by a special HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) unit based in Cardiff known as “Public Departments 1”. MPs are considered by HMRC to be likely to have complicated tax affairs and the HMRC guidance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll