header-logo header-logo

Homeward bound?

29 July 2009 / Samantha Morgan , Philip Munro
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Opinion , Tax
printer mail-detail

Samantha Morgan & Philip Munro lift the lid on MPs’ taxes & expenses

The spotlight of media scrutiny has been closely applied to MPs and their expenses claims during recent weeks, following the disclosure of parliamentary expenses records to the Daily Telegraph. The political fallout from the publication of these records has been significant, leading to the suspension of MPs by their parties, announcements that some MPs will stand down at the next general election and to some MPs repaying amounts claimed. One effect of this media reporting has been to bring the tax position of MPs into focus both in respect of the income tax treatment of their expenses and the capital gains tax (CGT) position of their homes.

Before considering the tax position of MPs, it is worth noting that the tax returns of MPs are dealt with by a special HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) unit based in Cardiff known as “Public Departments 1”. MPs are considered by HMRC to be likely to have complicated tax affairs and the HMRC guidance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll