header-logo header-logo

Hopes raised on PACCAR law

16 January 2024
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have welcomed further signs legislation will be introduced to reverse the PACCAR judgment, which restricts litigation funding

In R (on the application of PACCAR Inc and others) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and others [2023] UKSC 28, the Supreme Court held litigation funding agreements are damages-based agreements and therefore unenforceable.

The Financial Times reported this week Alex Chalk, the Lord Chancellor, told it in a statement: ‘The government will be reversing the damaging effects of PACCAR at the first legislative opportunity.’

Litigation funding enabled the group action of 555 subpostmasters caught up in the Horizon IT scandal against the Post Office, led by Freeths partner James Hartley, which was dramatised by ITV in Mr Bates vs The Post Office.

Martyn Day, co-president of the Collective Redress Lawyers Association (CORLA), said: ‘It has been alarming to see those opposed to litigation funding—unscrupulous big businesses and their cheerleaders—attempting to argue for legislation to restrict funders and law firms from obtaining justice.

‘Group or collective actions are now an intrinsic part of our legal system. If the government were to cave in and impose ill-thought-out restrictions on the ways in which funders and law firms operate, they would be denying access to justice to millions of citizens while giving businesses and corporations, set on using restrictive or unethical practices, a free hand.’

The government has already set out its plans for certain categories of cases—clause 126 of the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill reverses the effect of the case, but only for opt-out clauses in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT).

During a Lords debate in December on the Bill, Lord Sandhurst proposed a draft amendment to widen cl 126 beyond CAT. Viscount Camrose, for the government, stated the Bill was not the appropriate vehicle but the government was ‘actively considering options for a wider response’.

 

Issue: 8055 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

Maria Karaiskos KC, recently appointed as the first female head of Church Court Chambers, discusses breaking down barriers, the lure of the courtroom, and the power of storytelling

1 Hare Court—Peter Mitchell KC & Amber Sheridan

1 Hare Court—Peter Mitchell KC & Amber Sheridan

Leading family law set strengthens ranks with high-profile additions

Thackray Williams—Jennifer Nicol

Thackray Williams—Jennifer Nicol

Firm bolsters commercial team with senior employment partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Kelvin Rutledge KC of Cornerstone Barristers and Genevieve Screeche-Powell of Field Court Chambers examine the Court of Appeal’s rejection of a discrimination challenge to Tower Hamlets’ housing database
Michael Zander KC, Emeritus Professor at LSE, tracks the turbulent passage of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill through the House of Lords in this week's issue of NLJ. Two marathon debates drew contributions from nearly 200 peers, split between support, opposition and conditional approval
Alistair Mills of Landmark Chambers reflects on the Human Rights Act 1998 a quarter-century after it came into force, in this week's issue of NLJ
In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ, Stephen Gold surveys a raft of procedural changes and quirky disputes shaping civil practice. His message is clear: civil practitioners must brace for continual tweaks, unexpected contentions and rising costs in everyday litigation
Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar 2025 and joint head of chambers at 4PB, sets out in this week's NLJ how the profession will respond to Baroness Harriet Harman KC’s review into bullying, harassment and sexual misconduct at the Bar
back-to-top-scroll