header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007 / Richard Burger , William Dodsworth
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Horse whisperers

Richard Burger and William Dodsworth report on the Horseracing Regulatory Authority’s report into inside information

Over five million people visit British racecourses each year, while many more watch horseracing on TV, making it the second largest spectator sport in the UK. With the growth of betting exchanges and online gaming it is not surprising that betting on racing is the second most popular form of gambling after the National Lottery—more than 12% of the population bet on a horse race in the last year.

Unfortunately the potentially handsome gains to be made from betting on racehorses also attracts an unwelcome element, who are prepared to misuse inside information and influence races by betting on or laying a horse to lose. Perhaps mirroring the efforts of the City regulator, the Financial Services Authority (FSA), to combat insider dealing and the civil offence of market abuse; racings’ watchdog, the Horseracing Regulatory Authority (HRA), set up a working group to report on and recommend steps to enhance the integrity of racing, especially in the use of inside

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll