header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
05 July 2018 / Gary Blaker KC , Chris de Beneducci
Issue: 7800 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Property
printer mail-detail

House trap

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7800_beneducci

Property imposter fraud: where now for solicitors & estate agents? Gary Blaker QC & Chris de Beneducci investigate

  • Solicitor acting for fraudulent seller now liable for breach of trust.
  • Solicitor acting for innocent purchaser not relieved under s 61 of the Trustee Act 1925.
  • Conveyancing solicitors still benefit from Gran Gelato protection regarding negligence, but warranty of authority is another front of exposure.
  • Estate agents not liable to innocent purchaser in negligence even where no ID checks undertaken.

In P&P Property Ltd v (1) Owen White & Catlin LLP (2) Crownvent Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1082, [2018] All ER (D) 124 (May), which was heard alongside Dreamvar (UK) Ltd v (1) Mishcon de Reya (2) Mary Monson Solicitors Ltd earlier this year, the Court of Appeal considered where the loss should fall when a fraudster purports to sell a property which he or she does not own, takes the proceeds upon ‘completion’, and fails to give good title.

The basic facts

On 20 November 2013 Owen White & Catlin

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll