header-logo header-logo

House trap

05 July 2018 / Gary Blaker KC , Chris de Beneducci
Issue: 7800 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Property
printer mail-detail
nlj_7800_beneducci

Property imposter fraud: where now for solicitors & estate agents? Gary Blaker QC & Chris de Beneducci investigate

  • Solicitor acting for fraudulent seller now liable for breach of trust.
  • Solicitor acting for innocent purchaser not relieved under s 61 of the Trustee Act 1925.
  • Conveyancing solicitors still benefit from Gran Gelato protection regarding negligence, but warranty of authority is another front of exposure.
  • Estate agents not liable to innocent purchaser in negligence even where no ID checks undertaken.

In P&P Property Ltd v (1) Owen White & Catlin LLP (2) Crownvent Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1082, [2018] All ER (D) 124 (May), which was heard alongside Dreamvar (UK) Ltd v (1) Mishcon de Reya (2) Mary Monson Solicitors Ltd earlier this year, the Court of Appeal considered where the loss should fall when a fraudster purports to sell a property which he or she does not own, takes the proceeds upon ‘completion’, and fails to give good title.

The basic facts

On 20 November 2013 Owen White & Catlin

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll