header-logo header-logo

01 July 2010 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7424 / Categories: Features , Tax , Family , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Household Budgets

What did the Budget offer families stretched by family breakdown? Geraldine Morris reports

At the sharp end of family breakdown, family lawyers know only too well how making two households out of one stretches the finances of most families to the limit. As set out in more detail below, there’s some good news from last month’s budget, but for middle income families it’s largely bad news. The main knock-on effects for family lawyers trying to reach a workable settlement are:
 

  • Higher tax for higher rate tax payers means less disposable income available for periodical payments and/or to pay basic household expenditure.
  • Higher rates of capital gains tax (CGT) could impact on capital settlements where capital assets need to be sold to fund housing/lump sum payments.
  • For bigger money cases, the news that entrepreneur’s relief is to be increased is good news, although unlikely to assist the average family.
  • The freezing of child benefit for the next three years will impact most on the lowest income families. 
  • Changes to tax credits will benefit (slightly)
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll