header-logo header-logo

01 July 2010 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7424 / Categories: Features , Tax , Family , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Household Budgets

What did the Budget offer families stretched by family breakdown? Geraldine Morris reports

At the sharp end of family breakdown, family lawyers know only too well how making two households out of one stretches the finances of most families to the limit. As set out in more detail below, there’s some good news from last month’s budget, but for middle income families it’s largely bad news. The main knock-on effects for family lawyers trying to reach a workable settlement are:
 

  • Higher tax for higher rate tax payers means less disposable income available for periodical payments and/or to pay basic household expenditure.
  • Higher rates of capital gains tax (CGT) could impact on capital settlements where capital assets need to be sold to fund housing/lump sum payments.
  • For bigger money cases, the news that entrepreneur’s relief is to be increased is good news, although unlikely to assist the average family.
  • The freezing of child benefit for the next three years will impact most on the lowest income families. 
  • Changes to tax credits will benefit (slightly)
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
back-to-top-scroll