header-logo header-logo

01 July 2010 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7424 / Categories: Features , Tax , Family , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Household Budgets

What did the Budget offer families stretched by family breakdown? Geraldine Morris reports

At the sharp end of family breakdown, family lawyers know only too well how making two households out of one stretches the finances of most families to the limit. As set out in more detail below, there’s some good news from last month’s budget, but for middle income families it’s largely bad news. The main knock-on effects for family lawyers trying to reach a workable settlement are:
 

  • Higher tax for higher rate tax payers means less disposable income available for periodical payments and/or to pay basic household expenditure.
  • Higher rates of capital gains tax (CGT) could impact on capital settlements where capital assets need to be sold to fund housing/lump sum payments.
  • For bigger money cases, the news that entrepreneur’s relief is to be increased is good news, although unlikely to assist the average family.
  • The freezing of child benefit for the next three years will impact most on the lowest income families. 
  • Changes to tax credits will benefit (slightly)
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll