header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
16 December 2010 / Anne-marie Forker
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Book review: How to Argue Powerfully, Persuasively, Positively

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Jonathan Herring’s delightful “little red book” provides some useful tips on arguing that come from his background as a leading lawyer.

How to Argue Powerfully, Persuasively, Positively
Author: Jonathan Herring
Publisher: Prentice Hall Life; (21 Oct 2010)
ISBN-13: 978-0273734185, Price: £10.99

Jonathan Herring’s delightful “little red book” provides some useful tips on arguing that come from his background as a leading lawyer. However, it also contains advice on arguments of all sorts, from family situations, such as forgetting an important birthday, to uncomfortable office encounters. Herring is not just a lawyer, he is an Oxford academic, author, father, and husband. The arguing skills needed in all those roles are illustrated superbly.

The book divides into simple, focused sections and contains 10 “golden rules of argument”, one of which is “watch out for crafty tricks”, such as attacking the person, rather than the issue. Herring advises to keep cool, ignore personal insults, and focus on the theme of the argument.

So, if you find yourself in the unfortunate position of being

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll