header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
16 December 2010 / Anne-marie Forker
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Book review: How to Argue Powerfully, Persuasively, Positively

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Jonathan Herring’s delightful “little red book” provides some useful tips on arguing that come from his background as a leading lawyer.

How to Argue Powerfully, Persuasively, Positively
Author: Jonathan Herring
Publisher: Prentice Hall Life; (21 Oct 2010)
ISBN-13: 978-0273734185, Price: £10.99

Jonathan Herring’s delightful “little red book” provides some useful tips on arguing that come from his background as a leading lawyer. However, it also contains advice on arguments of all sorts, from family situations, such as forgetting an important birthday, to uncomfortable office encounters. Herring is not just a lawyer, he is an Oxford academic, author, father, and husband. The arguing skills needed in all those roles are illustrated superbly.

The book divides into simple, focused sections and contains 10 “golden rules of argument”, one of which is “watch out for crafty tricks”, such as attacking the person, rather than the issue. Herring advises to keep cool, ignore personal insults, and focus on the theme of the argument.

So, if you find yourself in the unfortunate position of being

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll