header-logo header-logo

26 October 2012
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

How to stem the flood?

Lawyers & citizens suffer from the rush to legislate, says Daniel Greenberg

The flood of Acts and statutory instruments shows no sign of abating, despite talk of de-regulation from successive governments. The more legislation Whitehall and Westminster make, the less the chance that sufficient time and other resources will be provided to ensure legislation of reasonable quality. So the problem for citizens and their advisers of handling the flow of new legislation is exacerbated by a significant proportion of it being of poor quality.

Legislating in haste

Recent high profile legislation that appears to have been legislated in haste and repented in even greater haste includes “pasty taxes” and charity tax reliefs; but there are many more lower-profile instances of legislation that have to be amended by a succession of attempts to rectify original defects.

The key to avoiding poor legislation is undoubtedly effective scrutiny in the early stages of the legislative process; going right back to the drafting stage and even earlier. However, given the increasing burden of work on civil servants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll