header-logo header-logo

26 October 2012
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

How to stem the flood?

Lawyers & citizens suffer from the rush to legislate, says Daniel Greenberg

The flood of Acts and statutory instruments shows no sign of abating, despite talk of de-regulation from successive governments. The more legislation Whitehall and Westminster make, the less the chance that sufficient time and other resources will be provided to ensure legislation of reasonable quality. So the problem for citizens and their advisers of handling the flow of new legislation is exacerbated by a significant proportion of it being of poor quality.

Legislating in haste

Recent high profile legislation that appears to have been legislated in haste and repented in even greater haste includes “pasty taxes” and charity tax reliefs; but there are many more lower-profile instances of legislation that have to be amended by a succession of attempts to rectify original defects.

The key to avoiding poor legislation is undoubtedly effective scrutiny in the early stages of the legislative process; going right back to the drafting stage and even earlier. However, given the increasing burden of work on civil servants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll