header-logo header-logo

How to stem the flood?

26 October 2012
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Lawyers & citizens suffer from the rush to legislate, says Daniel Greenberg

The flood of Acts and statutory instruments shows no sign of abating, despite talk of de-regulation from successive governments. The more legislation Whitehall and Westminster make, the less the chance that sufficient time and other resources will be provided to ensure legislation of reasonable quality. So the problem for citizens and their advisers of handling the flow of new legislation is exacerbated by a significant proportion of it being of poor quality.

Legislating in haste

Recent high profile legislation that appears to have been legislated in haste and repented in even greater haste includes “pasty taxes” and charity tax reliefs; but there are many more lower-profile instances of legislation that have to be amended by a succession of attempts to rectify original defects.

The key to avoiding poor legislation is undoubtedly effective scrutiny in the early stages of the legislative process; going right back to the drafting stage and even earlier. However, given the increasing burden of work on civil servants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll