header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
20 June 2025 / Sailesh Mehta , Theo Burges
Issue: 8121 / Categories: Features , Criminal , National security
printer mail-detail

How to sentence a spy

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
223037
Sailesh Mehta & Theo Burges consider the sentencing of Daniel Khalife & the growing intersection between terrorism & espionage offences
  • An overview of the history and core principles of sentencing in espionage cases.
  • The growing intersection between terrorism and espionage offences.
  • The likelihood that prosecutions in this area will increase significantly, making it essential for practitioners to deepen their understanding of this aspect of the law.

On 3 February 2025, Daniel Khalife was sentenced by Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb to 14 years and three months’ immediate custody. This followed a trial at Woolwich Crown Court from October to November 2024. Following trial, Khalife was found guilty of committing an act prejudicial to the safety or interests of the state, contrary to s 1(1)(c) of the Official Secrets Act 1911 (OSA 1911), and eliciting information about members of the armed forces, contrary to s 58A of the Terrorism Act 2000. Khalife pleaded guilty to escaping from lawful custody following the conclusion of his evidence in chief on 11 November 2024.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll