header-logo header-logo

07 July 2011
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Human rights

Sufi and another v United Kingdom [2011] ECHR 8319/07, [2011] All ER (D) 234 (Jun)

Contracting states had the right as a matter of international law and subject to their treaty obligations, including the European Convention on Human Rights, to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens. The right to political asylum was also not contained in either the Convention or its Protocols.

However, expulsion by a contracting state might give rise to an issue under Art 3, and hence engage the responsibility of that state under the Convention, where substantial grounds had been shown for believing that the person concerned, if deported, faced a real risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Art 3. The sole question for the court to consider in an expulsion case was whether, in all the circumstances of the case before it, substantial grounds had been shown for believing that the person concerned, if returned, would face a real risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Art 3 of the Convention.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll