header-logo header-logo

10 March 2021
Issue: 7924 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Human Rights Act fit for purpose

No compelling case for reform of the Human Rights Act exists, MPs and peers have warned. 

The Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) published its initial response to the government’s Independent Human Rights Act Review last week.

The JCHR said the Act had had a positive impact on the enforcement of human rights in the UK, and found that there was no case for reform under the terms of reference of the government’s review.

The chair of the committee, Ms Harriet Harman QC MP said: ‘Giving our courts a role in enforcing the rights given in the European Convention on Human Rights, has enabled individuals to enforce their rights, has added a UK judicial perspective on the ECHR and meant that there are now hardly any European Court rulings against the UK Government.’

Issue: 7924 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll