header-logo header-logo

17 February 2011
Issue: 7453 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Human rights business

Businesses are increasingly turning to the Human Rights Act to assert their commercial interests.

In reported court cases alone last year, 31 businesses used the Act, compared with 19 in the previous year, according to research by Sweet & Maxwell.

A larger number of human rights cases are also being settled or abandoned before reaching court. Examples in the last year include businesses using privacy arguments to prevent the media from running stories that might damage their corporate reputation, and a business trying to overturn an arbitration decision on the basis it deprived them of their right to a fair hearing.

Human rights are also a valuable asset in legal argument against HM Revenue & Customs—six per cent of reported tax cases refer to the Human Rights Act.

Stephen Grosz, partner at Bindmans LLP, says: “Since the legislation was passed, there have been a substantial number of legal disputes in which Human Rights Act arguments are made. But initial fears that it would be a `Rogues’ Charter’, which would open the floodgates to waves of spurious challenges, have proved to be exaggerated. The Act has been very important in helping a large number of individuals protect their interests.”

Issue: 7453 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll