header-logo header-logo

Human rights—Right to respect for private and family life—Gypsy

05 October 2012
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Buckland v United Kingdom (App. No. 40060/08) [2012] ECHR 40060/08, [2012] All ER (D) 141 (Sep)

European Court of Human Rights, Judges Lech Garlicki, President, Nicolas Bratza, Päivi Hirvelä, George Nicolaou, Ledi Bianku, Nebojša Vucinic, Vincent, De Gaetano, 18 Sep 2012

The inability of a gypsy to challenge the decision to seek a possession order on the basis of the alleged disproportionality of that decision in light of personal circumstances was in breach of Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), though subsequent legislative changes remedy the breach.

The applicant was a gypsy. A claim for possession was issued against her and her family in August 2005. At first instance, the judge considered whether the applicant could challenge the making of a possession order. He concluded that he was bound by previous authority (including Kay v United Kingdom (App No 37341/06)) to find that the only possible challenges to the making of the order were to the law itself or on conventional judicial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll