header-logo header-logo

05 October 2012
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Human rights—Right to respect for private and family life—Gypsy

Buckland v United Kingdom (App. No. 40060/08) [2012] ECHR 40060/08, [2012] All ER (D) 141 (Sep)

European Court of Human Rights, Judges Lech Garlicki, President, Nicolas Bratza, Päivi Hirvelä, George Nicolaou, Ledi Bianku, Nebojša Vucinic, Vincent, De Gaetano, 18 Sep 2012

The inability of a gypsy to challenge the decision to seek a possession order on the basis of the alleged disproportionality of that decision in light of personal circumstances was in breach of Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), though subsequent legislative changes remedy the breach.

The applicant was a gypsy. A claim for possession was issued against her and her family in August 2005. At first instance, the judge considered whether the applicant could challenge the making of a possession order. He concluded that he was bound by previous authority (including Kay v United Kingdom (App No 37341/06)) to find that the only possible challenges to the making of the order were to the law itself or on conventional judicial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll