header-logo header-logo

05 October 2012
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Human rights—Right to respect for private and family life—Gypsy

Buckland v United Kingdom (App. No. 40060/08) [2012] ECHR 40060/08, [2012] All ER (D) 141 (Sep)

European Court of Human Rights, Judges Lech Garlicki, President, Nicolas Bratza, Päivi Hirvelä, George Nicolaou, Ledi Bianku, Nebojša Vucinic, Vincent, De Gaetano, 18 Sep 2012

The inability of a gypsy to challenge the decision to seek a possession order on the basis of the alleged disproportionality of that decision in light of personal circumstances was in breach of Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), though subsequent legislative changes remedy the breach.

The applicant was a gypsy. A claim for possession was issued against her and her family in August 2005. At first instance, the judge considered whether the applicant could challenge the making of a possession order. He concluded that he was bound by previous authority (including Kay v United Kingdom (App No 37341/06)) to find that the only possible challenges to the making of the order were to the law itself or on conventional judicial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll