header-logo header-logo

17 January 2008 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

The hunt goes on

Is there any hope for campaigners who want to see the ban on hunting with dogs overthrown? Neil Parpworth reports

The Hunting Act 2004 (HuA 2004) is the most recent piece of legislation to be made pursuant to the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 procedure, ie without the consent of the House of Lords. The legal validity of HuA 2004 was unsuccessfully challenged by those who want to see the ban on hunting with hounds overthrown (see R (Jackson) v A-G [2005] UKHL 56, [2005] 4 All ER 1253).

Accordingly, the pro-hunting fraternity changed its line of attack by seeking to argue that HuA 2004 was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) or inconsistent with the EC Treaty. Its arguments failed to convince either the Divisional Court or the Court of Appeal (see R (on the application of Countryside Alliance) v A-G [2005] EWHC 1677 (Admin), [2005] All ER (D) 482 (Jul) and [2006] EWCA Civ 817, [2006] All ER (D) 264 (Jun)) respectively).

A unanimous House of Lords

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll