header-logo header-logo

Hurry up please, it’s time!

10 January 2014 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7589 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail
web_dobson

Bring judicial review claims promptly, warns Nicholas Dobson

Not too long ago, pub licensees well understood the importance of time. For, as TS Eliot noted in The Waste Land, once the clock had struck the witching hour of 10:30pm, the landlord would bellow (with the delicacy of a souped-up foghorn): “Hurry up please, it’s time!”

This is a precept which claimants and their litigators would also do well to “read, mark and inwardly digest”. For, on 2 August 2013, the Court of Appeal (upholding the Administrative Court below) decided that a challenge brought to a major outsourcing project, initiated by London Borough of Barnet, must fail as out of time (see R (Nash) v Barnet London Borough council [2013] EWCA Civ 1004).

The council’s proposals were described by the claimant as representing “a radical experiment in local government”, which would make Barnet “almost unrecognisable as a traditional council”. And Underhill LJ below, had acknowledged that the council’s proposals were “on any view outsourcing on a very large scale”.

But

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll