header-logo header-logo

10 January 2014 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7589 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Hurry up please, it’s time!

web_dobson

Bring judicial review claims promptly, warns Nicholas Dobson

Not too long ago, pub licensees well understood the importance of time. For, as TS Eliot noted in The Waste Land, once the clock had struck the witching hour of 10:30pm, the landlord would bellow (with the delicacy of a souped-up foghorn): “Hurry up please, it’s time!”

This is a precept which claimants and their litigators would also do well to “read, mark and inwardly digest”. For, on 2 August 2013, the Court of Appeal (upholding the Administrative Court below) decided that a challenge brought to a major outsourcing project, initiated by London Borough of Barnet, must fail as out of time (see R (Nash) v Barnet London Borough council [2013] EWCA Civ 1004).

The council’s proposals were described by the claimant as representing “a radical experiment in local government”, which would make Barnet “almost unrecognisable as a traditional council”. And Underhill LJ below, had acknowledged that the council’s proposals were “on any view outsourcing on a very large scale”.

But

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll