header-logo header-logo

Hurry up please, it’s time!

10 January 2014 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7589 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail
web_dobson

Bring judicial review claims promptly, warns Nicholas Dobson

Not too long ago, pub licensees well understood the importance of time. For, as TS Eliot noted in The Waste Land, once the clock had struck the witching hour of 10:30pm, the landlord would bellow (with the delicacy of a souped-up foghorn): “Hurry up please, it’s time!”

This is a precept which claimants and their litigators would also do well to “read, mark and inwardly digest”. For, on 2 August 2013, the Court of Appeal (upholding the Administrative Court below) decided that a challenge brought to a major outsourcing project, initiated by London Borough of Barnet, must fail as out of time (see R (Nash) v Barnet London Borough council [2013] EWCA Civ 1004).

The council’s proposals were described by the claimant as representing “a radical experiment in local government”, which would make Barnet “almost unrecognisable as a traditional council”. And Underhill LJ below, had acknowledged that the council’s proposals were “on any view outsourcing on a very large scale”.

But

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026
back-to-top-scroll