header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
10 January 2014 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7589 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Hurry up please, it’s time!

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
web_dobson

Bring judicial review claims promptly, warns Nicholas Dobson

Not too long ago, pub licensees well understood the importance of time. For, as TS Eliot noted in The Waste Land, once the clock had struck the witching hour of 10:30pm, the landlord would bellow (with the delicacy of a souped-up foghorn): “Hurry up please, it’s time!”

This is a precept which claimants and their litigators would also do well to “read, mark and inwardly digest”. For, on 2 August 2013, the Court of Appeal (upholding the Administrative Court below) decided that a challenge brought to a major outsourcing project, initiated by London Borough of Barnet, must fail as out of time (see R (Nash) v Barnet London Borough council [2013] EWCA Civ 1004).

The council’s proposals were described by the claimant as representing “a radical experiment in local government”, which would make Barnet “almost unrecognisable as a traditional council”. And Underhill LJ below, had acknowledged that the council’s proposals were “on any view outsourcing on a very large scale”.

But

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll