header-logo header-logo

02 December 2016 / David Locke
Issue: 7725 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Identity politics

nlj_7725_locke

David Locke examines gender-identity & discrimination in healthcare

  • In all medical decision-making, the preferred gender identity of the patient must be accepted and respected.

More profoundly personal even than sexual orientation, there is perhaps no more fundamental right than to be able to determine one’s own gender, and the view that this is a simple issue of genetics has been considered regressive for some years.

It is incontrovertibly true to say that many individuals and institutions have failed to keep pace with the rapid evolution in the understanding of gender identity. It is equally accurate to acknowledge that there is no small degree of controversy around the subject, which has led, among other well-publicised episodes, to the “non-platforming” of the feminist writer Germaine Greer (for pondering whether a person who was non-biologically female could ever become “female”) and a boycott of the entire state of North Carolina by Bruce Springsteen (in support of transgender rights).

Perhaps above all institutions, the NHS cannot be slow to embrace and adapt to these issues. If individuals are fearful

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll