header-logo header-logo

Identity politics

02 December 2016 / David Locke
Issue: 7725 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
nlj_7725_locke

David Locke examines gender-identity & discrimination in healthcare

  • In all medical decision-making, the preferred gender identity of the patient must be accepted and respected.

More profoundly personal even than sexual orientation, there is perhaps no more fundamental right than to be able to determine one’s own gender, and the view that this is a simple issue of genetics has been considered regressive for some years.

It is incontrovertibly true to say that many individuals and institutions have failed to keep pace with the rapid evolution in the understanding of gender identity. It is equally accurate to acknowledge that there is no small degree of controversy around the subject, which has led, among other well-publicised episodes, to the “non-platforming” of the feminist writer Germaine Greer (for pondering whether a person who was non-biologically female could ever become “female”) and a boycott of the entire state of North Carolina by Bruce Springsteen (in support of transgender rights).

Perhaps above all institutions, the NHS cannot be slow to embrace and adapt to these issues. If individuals are fearful

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Firm bolsters restructuring and insolvency team with partner hire

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Firm appoints first chief client officer

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

IP firm welcomes experienced patent litigator as partner

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll