header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
29 July 2010 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7428 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

If the cap fits

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Malcolm Dowden discusses the relationship between common law & the statutory cap on dilapidations

The judgment in PGF II v Royal and Sun Alliance [2010] EWHC 1459 (TCC), [2010] All ER (D) 175 (Jul) provides concise guidance on the relationship between the common law assessment of damages for disrepair, and the statutory cap applied by Landlord and Tenant Act 1927, s 18. That cap was enacted to overrule the perceived injustice of the common law rule set out in Joyner v Weeks [1891] 2 QB 31, which was taken to mean that a landlord might obtain a windfall through being able to claim damages for disrepair even where the premises were to be demolished or substantially refurbished at or soon after termination of the lease.

In PGF II the tenants argued that the House of Lords ruling in Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth [1996] AC 344, [1995] 3 All ER 268 had changed the law, so that Joyner v Weeks would now be decided differently and the “windfall” element of damages would

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll