header-logo header-logo

18 November 2010 / Philip Thornton
Issue: 7442 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Ignorance of a disability

Philip Thornton considers some unfortunate drafting in the Equality Act 2010

Where a breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments is alleged, an employer has always had a defence where it would be unreasonable to expect it to know that any adjustments might be required. That defence originally worked (under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995)) by disapplying the duty in two situations:

  • applicants for employment: where the employer does not know, and could not reasonably be expected to know that the relevant disabled person is, or may be, an applicant for the employment;
  • in any case: where the employer does not know, and could not reasonably be expected to know that the person has a disability and is likely to be placed at a substantial disadvantage by any of the employer's “arrangements” or the physical features of its premises.

Although the first exception, regarding applicants for employment, has been re-enacted successfully without major change under the Equality Act 2010, the revised wording of the second exception, regarding lack of knowledge

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll