header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 160, Issue 7442

18 November 2010
IN THIS ISSUE

The state should not underestimate the public’s belief in justice & fair play, says Steve Hynes

February 14th is the closing date for responses to the government consultation on Jackson, just published.

Ed Miliband may, or may not, prove to be a successful leader of the Labour Party...

The history of the HIP is a lesson in how not to make policy...

Sarah Crowther reflects on the human dimension of effective determination dates

Geraldine Morris assesses the impact of the coalition’s spending review

Does Lord Young’s report represent a return to common sense? Atiyah Malik & Alistair Kinley report

Keith Davies explores the world of trespass to land & drilling for oil

Angus McIntosh presents some property predictions

Annette Cafferkey reflects on the Pinnock effect

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW strengthens global insurance practice and Greater China offering with London Partner hire

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon boosts Energy and Utilities practice with appointment of David McEwing

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson adds international construction arbitration partner in London push

NEWS
Law firm trainees are choosing US firms over their UK comparators, according to Chambers’ annual report on UK trainee satisfaction
A former senior judge has warned peers against scrapping juries for fraud and financial crimes, ahead of the Courts and Tribunals Bill’s second reading in the House of Lords this week
Civil practitioners face changes spanning debt recovery, workplace harassment and possession claims, alongside guidance on insolvency challenges and children proceedings

Finding matrimonial wealth is as challenging as dividing it, as family disputes draw practitioners into asset tracing, offshore structures and insolvency

Agreement between opponents offers no guarantee that a court will approve a retrospective increase to a costs budget
back-to-top-scroll