header-logo header-logo

Termination dates

Sarah Crowther reflects on the human dimension of effective determination dates

The Supreme Court has handed down its judgment in Gisda Cyf v Barratt [2010] UKSC 41, the latest instalment in the legal uncertainty which has surrounded determination of the effective date of termination (EDT) in employment cases. It has upheld the decision of the majority of the Court of Appeal, but does the final word leave the law sufficiently certain for practitioners, employers and employees?

Section 97(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 provides that the EDT is, in a case of termination of employment without notice, the date on which termination takes effect. This somewhat elusive provision is hugely important in employment cases. 

  • Most obviously it determines the date on which time starts to run for limitation purposes in unfair dismissal claims and discrimination claims where the act complained of is dismissal or where dismissal is the last event in a course of conduct.
  • It is relevant in determining which substantive law applies, such as in recent changes to the law
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
back-to-top-scroll