header-logo header-logo

Termination dates

Sarah Crowther reflects on the human dimension of effective determination dates

The Supreme Court has handed down its judgment in Gisda Cyf v Barratt [2010] UKSC 41, the latest instalment in the legal uncertainty which has surrounded determination of the effective date of termination (EDT) in employment cases. It has upheld the decision of the majority of the Court of Appeal, but does the final word leave the law sufficiently certain for practitioners, employers and employees?

Section 97(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 provides that the EDT is, in a case of termination of employment without notice, the date on which termination takes effect. This somewhat elusive provision is hugely important in employment cases. 

  • Most obviously it determines the date on which time starts to run for limitation purposes in unfair dismissal claims and discrimination claims where the act complained of is dismissal or where dismissal is the last event in a course of conduct.
  • It is relevant in determining which substantive law applies, such as in recent changes to the law
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
Lawyers have been asked for their views on proposals to change the penalties for assaulting a police officer
back-to-top-scroll