header-logo header-logo

Family fortunes

19 November 2010 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7442 / Categories: Features , Tax , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Geraldine Morris assesses the impact of the coalition’s spending review

Family law is affected not only by changes in the law but also wider issues impacting on families. Practicality is a family lawyer’s byword and the government’s Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) has introduced and added to changes which will impact on families in the widest sense—particularly those who are going through or have gone through a family breakdown.

The following are the principal changes to the taxation of families announced by the chancellor of the exchequer, George Osborne, last month. The changes to the tax credit system are in addition to those announced in the June 2010 Budget.

Other changes which will impact upon families and their income and expenditure  are also detailed. Further details of the CSR provisions are expected to be announced in due course.

Child benefit

From 2013 child benefit will be withdrawn from families in which one or both parents are higher-rate taxpayers, ie earning more than £44,000 a year.
Education maintenance allowance

The education maintenance allowance of £30 per

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll