header-logo header-logo

Playing with fire

20 November 2010 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7442 / Categories: Features , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
new_image_19_4

The state should not underestimate the public’s belief in justice & fair play, says Steve Hynes

In the legal aid world we often prepare for the worse and hope things will turn out better than we feared. Unfortunately, the cuts announced on Monday are far worse than we feared.

Over half the cases undertaken under the civil legal aid scheme will wipe out at a stroke, if the government’s proposed amendments to scope go ahead. According to the Ministry of Justice’s own impact assessment half a million people will no-longer be able to obtain assistance with family, debt, employment, benefits, housing and other civil law cases.

Jonathan Djanogly, the minister responsible for legal aid, promised that this was not going to be a “salami slicing review”. It certainly isn’t. What we got instead is the decimation of the civil legal aid scheme reducing it back to a rump of cases that directly engage human rights, but leaving out those areas of law which ordinary members of the public are most likely to help

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll