header-logo header-logo

20 November 2010 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7442 / Categories: Features , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Playing with fire

new_image_19_4

The state should not underestimate the public’s belief in justice & fair play, says Steve Hynes

In the legal aid world we often prepare for the worse and hope things will turn out better than we feared. Unfortunately, the cuts announced on Monday are far worse than we feared.

Over half the cases undertaken under the civil legal aid scheme will wipe out at a stroke, if the government’s proposed amendments to scope go ahead. According to the Ministry of Justice’s own impact assessment half a million people will no-longer be able to obtain assistance with family, debt, employment, benefits, housing and other civil law cases.

Jonathan Djanogly, the minister responsible for legal aid, promised that this was not going to be a “salami slicing review”. It certainly isn’t. What we got instead is the decimation of the civil legal aid scheme reducing it back to a rump of cases that directly engage human rights, but leaving out those areas of law which ordinary members of the public are most likely to help

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll