header-logo header-logo

Playing with fire

20 November 2010 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7442 / Categories: Features , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
new_image_19_4

The state should not underestimate the public’s belief in justice & fair play, says Steve Hynes

In the legal aid world we often prepare for the worse and hope things will turn out better than we feared. Unfortunately, the cuts announced on Monday are far worse than we feared.

Over half the cases undertaken under the civil legal aid scheme will wipe out at a stroke, if the government’s proposed amendments to scope go ahead. According to the Ministry of Justice’s own impact assessment half a million people will no-longer be able to obtain assistance with family, debt, employment, benefits, housing and other civil law cases.

Jonathan Djanogly, the minister responsible for legal aid, promised that this was not going to be a “salami slicing review”. It certainly isn’t. What we got instead is the decimation of the civil legal aid scheme reducing it back to a rump of cases that directly engage human rights, but leaving out those areas of law which ordinary members of the public are most likely to help

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll