header-logo header-logo

Subterranean trespassers

18 November 2010 / Keith Davies
Issue: 7442 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Keith Davies explores the world of trespass to land & drilling for oil

What view is taken by English property law of a dispute between two neighbours one of whom has tunnelled beneath the other’s land without so much as a by-your-leave and the other objects to this? “Absurdly simple”, as Watson said to Holmes or vice versa…But such an imbroglio recently came all the way up to the Supreme Court, with five Justices sitting; and on one of the two issues involved all five justices were agreed, whereas on the other issue they were divided. They were unanimous that a trespass had been committed, but on the financial consequences they divided 3-2.

In Bocardo SA v Star Energy UK Onshore Ltd and another [2010] 3 All ER 975, Lord Hope DP, giving the first judgment, said the issues, raised by the case, fell into two parts: “First, there is the question whether the drilling of the three wells under Bocardo’s land was an actionable trespass. Secondly, if there was an actionable trespass, there is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll