header-logo header-logo

Subterranean trespassers

18 November 2010 / Keith Davies
Issue: 7442 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Keith Davies explores the world of trespass to land & drilling for oil

What view is taken by English property law of a dispute between two neighbours one of whom has tunnelled beneath the other’s land without so much as a by-your-leave and the other objects to this? “Absurdly simple”, as Watson said to Holmes or vice versa…But such an imbroglio recently came all the way up to the Supreme Court, with five Justices sitting; and on one of the two issues involved all five justices were agreed, whereas on the other issue they were divided. They were unanimous that a trespass had been committed, but on the financial consequences they divided 3-2.

In Bocardo SA v Star Energy UK Onshore Ltd and another [2010] 3 All ER 975, Lord Hope DP, giving the first judgment, said the issues, raised by the case, fell into two parts: “First, there is the question whether the drilling of the three wells under Bocardo’s land was an actionable trespass. Secondly, if there was an actionable trespass, there is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll