header-logo header-logo

18 November 2010 / Keith Davies
Issue: 7442 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Subterranean trespassers

Keith Davies explores the world of trespass to land & drilling for oil

What view is taken by English property law of a dispute between two neighbours one of whom has tunnelled beneath the other’s land without so much as a by-your-leave and the other objects to this? “Absurdly simple”, as Watson said to Holmes or vice versa…But such an imbroglio recently came all the way up to the Supreme Court, with five Justices sitting; and on one of the two issues involved all five justices were agreed, whereas on the other issue they were divided. They were unanimous that a trespass had been committed, but on the financial consequences they divided 3-2.

In Bocardo SA v Star Energy UK Onshore Ltd and another [2010] 3 All ER 975, Lord Hope DP, giving the first judgment, said the issues, raised by the case, fell into two parts: “First, there is the question whether the drilling of the three wells under Bocardo’s land was an actionable trespass. Secondly, if there was an actionable trespass, there is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll