header-logo header-logo

05 March 2025
Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Rule of law , Training & education
printer mail-detail

ILBF essay competition—the rule of law in the next 20 years

Law undergraduates across the UK are invited to take part in this year’s International Law Book Facility (ILBF) essay competition.

The deadline is 4pm, 22 April 2025 for essays of up to 1,000 words on the topic: ‘What will be the challenges to the rule of law in the next 20 years?’

Launching the competition last month, Baroness Carr, the Lady Chief Justice, said: ‘The essay competition is such a great opportunity for law undergraduates in the UK to engage with a subject that prompts them to think about the law as it is evolving, the challenges the law will need to address for the future and the wider context of law in society.

‘I think it’s also a chance to hone that essential skill of developing robust arguments backed up by solid research. Both will help law undergraduates to prepare for those all-important applications and those interviews when you are securing work experience pupillages or training contracts.’

This year’s judges are former Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas, former Supreme Court Justice, Lord Carnwath, and Yasmin Batliwala, Chief Executive of Advocates for International Development, A4ID. 

The competition, sponsored by law firm Brown Rudnick, is now in its 20th year and is open to all undergraduates studying law at UK universities. Finalists will be invited to the ILBF’s 20th anniversary event at Clifford Chance’s London office in May, where the winners will be announced.

First prize is a week’s internship in summer 2025 at Brown Rudnick, and publication of the winning essay in the Commonwealth Lawyers Association newsletter and on the ILBF’s website. The runner-up essay will be published on the ILBF website.

To find out more, including details on how to enter, see here. 

For inspiration, follow the ILBF on Facebook, LinkedIn and YouTube, and watch Baroness Carr launch the competition in this short film.

The ILBF supports the rule of law and access to justice for all through sharing legal knowledge. Since the charity’s foundation 20 years ago, the ILBF has distributed more than 93,000 legal textbooks to more than 285 organisations in 62 countries, supporting law students, teachers, lawyers and judges across the world. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll