header-logo header-logo

01 April 2010 / Caroline Lody , David Hertzell
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Illegality defence

The complexities of the illegality defence could soon be history. David Hertzell & Caroline Lody explain why

The Law Commission published a final report and draft Bill to reform the illegality defence in trusts law last month. The reforms aim to make the law clearer and less arbitrary. The draft Trusts (Concealment of Interests) Bill applies where a trust has been created to conceal the ownership of property for a criminal purpose, such as where someone “parks” property in someone else’s name to defraud creditors. The Bill provides that in most cases, a claimant beneficiary would be able to rely on their normal right to enforce the trust. However, in exceptional circumstances the courts would have a discretion to give the property to the trustee.

The problem

Calls for law reform arose out of the House of Lords’ decision in Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340. Here a couple bought a house together but registered it in Ms Tinsley’s name only, so that Ms Milligan could unlawfully claim social security

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll