header-logo header-logo

Illegality defence

01 April 2010 / Caroline Lody , David Hertzell
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

The complexities of the illegality defence could soon be history. David Hertzell & Caroline Lody explain why

The Law Commission published a final report and draft Bill to reform the illegality defence in trusts law last month. The reforms aim to make the law clearer and less arbitrary. The draft Trusts (Concealment of Interests) Bill applies where a trust has been created to conceal the ownership of property for a criminal purpose, such as where someone “parks” property in someone else’s name to defraud creditors. The Bill provides that in most cases, a claimant beneficiary would be able to rely on their normal right to enforce the trust. However, in exceptional circumstances the courts would have a discretion to give the property to the trustee.

The problem

Calls for law reform arose out of the House of Lords’ decision in Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340. Here a couple bought a house together but registered it in Ms Tinsley’s name only, so that Ms Milligan could unlawfully claim social security

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll