header-logo header-logo

david-hertzell_master

David Hertzell

Law commissioner

David Hertzell, law commissioner, Law Commission (www.lawcom.gov.uk)

Law commissioner

David Hertzell, law commissioner, Law Commission (www.lawcom.gov.uk)

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

David Hertzell & Julia Jarzabkowski aim to fend off groundless IP threats

Victims of misleading & aggressive demands for payment need protection, say David Hertzell & Amy Smith

How can we protect victims of unfair commercial practices, ask David Hertzell & Amy Smith

David Hertzell & Colin Moore examine the potential benefits & pitfalls of the Common European Sales Law

David Hertzell & Colin Moore assess the legal challenges facing the providers of PIP breast implants

Victims of scams deserve a clear & easy route to redress, says David Hertzell

The complexities of the illegality defence could soon be history. David Hertzell & Caroline Lody explain why

David Hertzell & James Sharpe chart the history & progress of the Third Parties Bill

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll