header-logo header-logo

Europe online

23 March 2012 / Colin Moore , David Hertzell
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
istock_000016393107medium_4

David Hertzell & Colin Moore examine the potential benefits & pitfalls of the Common European Sales Law

The European Commission published a proposed regulation for a Common European Sales Law (CESL) in October 2011. Its intention is to improve cross-border trade within the EU by removing legal barriers which increase the cost of doing business with other member states. As the title makes clear, the CESL is a proposed law for the sale of goods (and certain related services) across Europe. In essence it is two separate proposals: one for business-to-business transactions (considered in “The wrong vehicle”, 161 NLJ 7490, p 1589) and the other for business-to-consumer transactions.

The Law Commission and Scottish Law Commission were asked to advise the government about the potential advantages and problems of the CESL. This article focuses on business-to-consumer sales. The Commissions think that there is a case for an optional distance selling code, which could bring benefits to British businesses, but much more thought needs to be given to the details of the proposal.

Rome I:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll