header-logo header-logo

23 March 2012 / Colin Moore , David Hertzell
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Europe online

istock_000016393107medium_4

David Hertzell & Colin Moore examine the potential benefits & pitfalls of the Common European Sales Law

The European Commission published a proposed regulation for a Common European Sales Law (CESL) in October 2011. Its intention is to improve cross-border trade within the EU by removing legal barriers which increase the cost of doing business with other member states. As the title makes clear, the CESL is a proposed law for the sale of goods (and certain related services) across Europe. In essence it is two separate proposals: one for business-to-business transactions (considered in “The wrong vehicle”, 161 NLJ 7490, p 1589) and the other for business-to-consumer transactions.

The Law Commission and Scottish Law Commission were asked to advise the government about the potential advantages and problems of the CESL. This article focuses on business-to-consumer sales. The Commissions think that there is a case for an optional distance selling code, which could bring benefits to British businesses, but much more thought needs to be given to the details of the proposal.

Rome I:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll