header-logo header-logo

Europe online

23 March 2012 / Colin Moore , David Hertzell
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
istock_000016393107medium_4

David Hertzell & Colin Moore examine the potential benefits & pitfalls of the Common European Sales Law

The European Commission published a proposed regulation for a Common European Sales Law (CESL) in October 2011. Its intention is to improve cross-border trade within the EU by removing legal barriers which increase the cost of doing business with other member states. As the title makes clear, the CESL is a proposed law for the sale of goods (and certain related services) across Europe. In essence it is two separate proposals: one for business-to-business transactions (considered in “The wrong vehicle”, 161 NLJ 7490, p 1589) and the other for business-to-consumer transactions.

The Law Commission and Scottish Law Commission were asked to advise the government about the potential advantages and problems of the CESL. This article focuses on business-to-consumer sales. The Commissions think that there is a case for an optional distance selling code, which could bring benefits to British businesses, but much more thought needs to be given to the details of the proposal.

Rome I:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll