header-logo header-logo

Beating the bullies

27 June 2013 / David Hertzell
Issue: 7566 / Categories: Opinion , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail
157580470

David Hertzell & Julia Jarzabkowski aim to fend off groundless IP threats

Intellectual property rights are valuable and support economic growth by encouraging and rewarding innovation. For many businesses, patents, trade marks and design rights can be among their most important assets. Their worth, however, is undermined through unauthorised use and so a robust response to infringement makes good business sense. But threats to sue can be misused. A threat may be made, not with the intention of protecting an IP right, but as a means to damage a competitor.

Threats of infringement proceedings have a pernicious effect because IP litigation can be complex, disruptive and expensive, as the global battle between Apple and Samsung confirms. If a threat is made to the trade source of an infringement, such as a manufacturer or importer, they may be more likely to stand their ground as they may have more invested in the product or process. That isn’t the case with retailers or customers. If threatened, the mere prospect of litigation can be enough to change their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll