header-logo header-logo

Beating the bullies

27 June 2013 / David Hertzell
Issue: 7566 / Categories: Opinion , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail
157580470

David Hertzell & Julia Jarzabkowski aim to fend off groundless IP threats

Intellectual property rights are valuable and support economic growth by encouraging and rewarding innovation. For many businesses, patents, trade marks and design rights can be among their most important assets. Their worth, however, is undermined through unauthorised use and so a robust response to infringement makes good business sense. But threats to sue can be misused. A threat may be made, not with the intention of protecting an IP right, but as a means to damage a competitor.

Threats of infringement proceedings have a pernicious effect because IP litigation can be complex, disruptive and expensive, as the global battle between Apple and Samsung confirms. If a threat is made to the trade source of an infringement, such as a manufacturer or importer, they may be more likely to stand their ground as they may have more invested in the product or process. That isn’t the case with retailers or customers. If threatened, the mere prospect of litigation can be enough to change their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll