header-logo header-logo

Consumer affairs

25 May 2012 / Amy Smith , David Hertzell
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial
printer mail-detail

How can we protect victims of unfair commercial practices, ask David Hertzell & Amy Smith

This month is Scams Awareness Month. Research commissioned by Consumer Focus in 2009 found that around two thirds of those questioned had been subjected to misleading or aggressive sales practices. They estimated that these practices cost consumers around £3.3bn every year. Moreover, honest businesses are undermined by the unscrupulous.

Speak out

The Trading Standards Institute, Citizens Advice, and Action Fraud are encouraging consumers to speak out if they have been a victim of a scam. They are also helping consumers to recognise a scam. But what happens when you fall victim to a misleading or aggressive sales practice? The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission have recently published a report which deals with these issues.

The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277) (the regulations) implemented the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive into UK law in 2008. The regulations prohibit unfair commercial practices which include: misleading actions, misleading omissions and aggressive practices. The regulations also

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll