header-logo header-logo

Consumer affairs

25 May 2012 / Amy Smith , David Hertzell
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial
printer mail-detail

How can we protect victims of unfair commercial practices, ask David Hertzell & Amy Smith

This month is Scams Awareness Month. Research commissioned by Consumer Focus in 2009 found that around two thirds of those questioned had been subjected to misleading or aggressive sales practices. They estimated that these practices cost consumers around £3.3bn every year. Moreover, honest businesses are undermined by the unscrupulous.

Speak out

The Trading Standards Institute, Citizens Advice, and Action Fraud are encouraging consumers to speak out if they have been a victim of a scam. They are also helping consumers to recognise a scam. But what happens when you fall victim to a misleading or aggressive sales practice? The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission have recently published a report which deals with these issues.

The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277) (the regulations) implemented the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive into UK law in 2008. The regulations prohibit unfair commercial practices which include: misleading actions, misleading omissions and aggressive practices. The regulations also

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll