header-logo header-logo

25 May 2012 / Amy Smith , David Hertzell
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Consumer affairs

How can we protect victims of unfair commercial practices, ask David Hertzell & Amy Smith

This month is Scams Awareness Month. Research commissioned by Consumer Focus in 2009 found that around two thirds of those questioned had been subjected to misleading or aggressive sales practices. They estimated that these practices cost consumers around £3.3bn every year. Moreover, honest businesses are undermined by the unscrupulous.

Speak out

The Trading Standards Institute, Citizens Advice, and Action Fraud are encouraging consumers to speak out if they have been a victim of a scam. They are also helping consumers to recognise a scam. But what happens when you fall victim to a misleading or aggressive sales practice? The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission have recently published a report which deals with these issues.

The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277) (the regulations) implemented the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive into UK law in 2008. The regulations prohibit unfair commercial practices which include: misleading actions, misleading omissions and aggressive practices. The regulations also

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll