header-logo header-logo

10 December 2009 / James Sharpe , David Hertzell
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Streamlining liability

David Hertzell & James Sharpe chart the history & progress of the Third Parties Bill

The Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Bill was introduced in the House of Lords last month. The Bill follows the widely supported recommendations of the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission, published in 2001.

The Bill replaces the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 1930 (and its Northern Ireland equivalent). The 1930 Acts sought to deal with the problem highlighted in Re Harrington Motor Company [1928] Ch 105. The claimant was injured by a car belonging to an insured company.

He won damages, but the company was wound up before he could enforce the judgment. The court ruled that the insurance proceeds were part of the assets of the company, to be distributed among the creditors, denying the victim his full payment.

The 1930 Acts are not just confined to road traffic cases, but apply generally. When an insured is liable to a third party, eg an employee, and the insured becomes insolvent, the Acts transfer the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll