header-logo header-logo

Streamlining liability

10 December 2009 / James Sharpe , David Hertzell
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

David Hertzell & James Sharpe chart the history & progress of the Third Parties Bill

The Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Bill was introduced in the House of Lords last month. The Bill follows the widely supported recommendations of the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission, published in 2001.

The Bill replaces the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 1930 (and its Northern Ireland equivalent). The 1930 Acts sought to deal with the problem highlighted in Re Harrington Motor Company [1928] Ch 105. The claimant was injured by a car belonging to an insured company.

He won damages, but the company was wound up before he could enforce the judgment. The court ruled that the insurance proceeds were part of the assets of the company, to be distributed among the creditors, denying the victim his full payment.

The 1930 Acts are not just confined to road traffic cases, but apply generally. When an insured is liable to a third party, eg an employee, and the insured becomes insolvent, the Acts transfer the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll