header-logo header-logo

Streamlining liability

10 December 2009 / James Sharpe , David Hertzell
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

David Hertzell & James Sharpe chart the history & progress of the Third Parties Bill

The Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Bill was introduced in the House of Lords last month. The Bill follows the widely supported recommendations of the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission, published in 2001.

The Bill replaces the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 1930 (and its Northern Ireland equivalent). The 1930 Acts sought to deal with the problem highlighted in Re Harrington Motor Company [1928] Ch 105. The claimant was injured by a car belonging to an insured company.

He won damages, but the company was wound up before he could enforce the judgment. The court ruled that the insurance proceeds were part of the assets of the company, to be distributed among the creditors, denying the victim his full payment.

The 1930 Acts are not just confined to road traffic cases, but apply generally. When an insured is liable to a third party, eg an employee, and the insured becomes insolvent, the Acts transfer the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll