header-logo header-logo

Streamlining liability

10 December 2009 / James Sharpe , David Hertzell
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

David Hertzell & James Sharpe chart the history & progress of the Third Parties Bill

The Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Bill was introduced in the House of Lords last month. The Bill follows the widely supported recommendations of the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission, published in 2001.

The Bill replaces the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 1930 (and its Northern Ireland equivalent). The 1930 Acts sought to deal with the problem highlighted in Re Harrington Motor Company [1928] Ch 105. The claimant was injured by a car belonging to an insured company.

He won damages, but the company was wound up before he could enforce the judgment. The court ruled that the insurance proceeds were part of the assets of the company, to be distributed among the creditors, denying the victim his full payment.

The 1930 Acts are not just confined to road traffic cases, but apply generally. When an insured is liable to a third party, eg an employee, and the insured becomes insolvent, the Acts transfer the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll