header-logo header-logo

19 October 2012 / Amy Smith , David Hertzell
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taking on the legal muggers

nlj_7534_1313_specialist_consumerlaw_hertzell_4

Victims of misleading & aggressive demands for payment need protection, say David Hertzell & Amy Smith

Rogue wheel-clampers strike fear into the hearts of drivers everywhere. News stories tell of intimidating clampers who threaten those who have unknowingly parked on the clamper’s land. In fact the AA has declared it “legalised mugging”.

Now the government plans to make wheel-clamping on private land illegal. The Protection of Freedoms Act received Royal Assent in May this year. The Act outlaws wheel-clamping on private land: s 54 creates the new offence of immobilising vehicles on private land, punishable upon conviction in the Crown Court by an unlimited fine.

There are questions, however, as to whether this new Act will curb the actions of rogue clampers. Scotland has declared wheel-clamping on private land illegal since 1992 (Black v Carmichael 1992 SLT 897). But following this development, land owners have found another way of trying to prevent people from parking on their land: ticketing. Therefore, although immobilising vehicles parked on private land will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll