header-logo header-logo

Taking on the legal muggers

19 October 2012 / Amy Smith , David Hertzell
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7534_1313_specialist_consumerlaw_hertzell_4

Victims of misleading & aggressive demands for payment need protection, say David Hertzell & Amy Smith

Rogue wheel-clampers strike fear into the hearts of drivers everywhere. News stories tell of intimidating clampers who threaten those who have unknowingly parked on the clamper’s land. In fact the AA has declared it “legalised mugging”.

Now the government plans to make wheel-clamping on private land illegal. The Protection of Freedoms Act received Royal Assent in May this year. The Act outlaws wheel-clamping on private land: s 54 creates the new offence of immobilising vehicles on private land, punishable upon conviction in the Crown Court by an unlimited fine.

There are questions, however, as to whether this new Act will curb the actions of rogue clampers. Scotland has declared wheel-clamping on private land illegal since 1992 (Black v Carmichael 1992 SLT 897). But following this development, land owners have found another way of trying to prevent people from parking on their land: ticketing. Therefore, although immobilising vehicles parked on private land will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll