header-logo header-logo

Taking on the legal muggers

19 October 2012 / Amy Smith , David Hertzell
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7534_1313_specialist_consumerlaw_hertzell_4

Victims of misleading & aggressive demands for payment need protection, say David Hertzell & Amy Smith

Rogue wheel-clampers strike fear into the hearts of drivers everywhere. News stories tell of intimidating clampers who threaten those who have unknowingly parked on the clamper’s land. In fact the AA has declared it “legalised mugging”.

Now the government plans to make wheel-clamping on private land illegal. The Protection of Freedoms Act received Royal Assent in May this year. The Act outlaws wheel-clamping on private land: s 54 creates the new offence of immobilising vehicles on private land, punishable upon conviction in the Crown Court by an unlimited fine.

There are questions, however, as to whether this new Act will curb the actions of rogue clampers. Scotland has declared wheel-clamping on private land illegal since 1992 (Black v Carmichael 1992 SLT 897). But following this development, land owners have found another way of trying to prevent people from parking on their land: ticketing. Therefore, although immobilising vehicles parked on private land will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll