header-logo header-logo

Taking on the legal muggers

19 October 2012 / Amy Smith , David Hertzell
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7534_1313_specialist_consumerlaw_hertzell_4

Victims of misleading & aggressive demands for payment need protection, say David Hertzell & Amy Smith

Rogue wheel-clampers strike fear into the hearts of drivers everywhere. News stories tell of intimidating clampers who threaten those who have unknowingly parked on the clamper’s land. In fact the AA has declared it “legalised mugging”.

Now the government plans to make wheel-clamping on private land illegal. The Protection of Freedoms Act received Royal Assent in May this year. The Act outlaws wheel-clamping on private land: s 54 creates the new offence of immobilising vehicles on private land, punishable upon conviction in the Crown Court by an unlimited fine.

There are questions, however, as to whether this new Act will curb the actions of rogue clampers. Scotland has declared wheel-clamping on private land illegal since 1992 (Black v Carmichael 1992 SLT 897). But following this development, land owners have found another way of trying to prevent people from parking on their land: ticketing. Therefore, although immobilising vehicles parked on private land will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll