header-logo header-logo

Immigration

05 January 2012
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Chapti and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 3370 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 135 (Dec)

Amendments were made to para 281 of the Immigration Rules HC 395 which required foreign spouses and partners of British citizens or persons settled in the UK applying for leave to enter the UK with a view to settlement, to produce a test certificate of knowledge of the English language to a prescribed standard.

Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights did not confer a right to marry in the UK where one party to the proposed marriage was abroad and had no right to enter the UK and the rule did not interfere with the rights of persons under Art 12 of the Convention.

The aims of the rule, to promote integration and to protect public services, were legitimate aims within Art 8(2) of the Convention and the fact that it might, in an individual case, be possible to argue that the operation of the exceptions in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll