header-logo header-logo

07 March 2014
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Immigration

R (on the application of Kajuga) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 426 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 273 (Feb)

It was a matter of common sense that if a person obstructed the deportation process and fails to cooperate with the secretary of state then the “reasonable” period would be longer and probably much longer. While it might not be indefinite, it could certainly extend to a period covering, if necessary, a number of years, provided the secretary of state made real and continuous efforts to ascertain where the detainee had come from and should be deported to. The period would continue to be reasonable until those efforts were finally exhausted. If that were not the case then those liable to deportation could frustrate the process and work it to their own advantage by failing to co-operate with the authorities. Their release back into the community could generate fresh claims, prolonging the deportation process and using up further resource.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll