header-logo header-logo

07 March 2014
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Immigration

R (on the application of Kajuga) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 426 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 273 (Feb)

It was a matter of common sense that if a person obstructed the deportation process and fails to cooperate with the secretary of state then the “reasonable” period would be longer and probably much longer. While it might not be indefinite, it could certainly extend to a period covering, if necessary, a number of years, provided the secretary of state made real and continuous efforts to ascertain where the detainee had come from and should be deported to. The period would continue to be reasonable until those efforts were finally exhausted. If that were not the case then those liable to deportation could frustrate the process and work it to their own advantage by failing to co-operate with the authorities. Their release back into the community could generate fresh claims, prolonging the deportation process and using up further resource.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll