header-logo header-logo

18 November 2010
Issue: 7442 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Immigration

R (on the application of Elmi and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 2775 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 124 (Nov)

What mattered in relation to an application for fee exemption under the Immigration and Nationality Fees Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/1158), the Consular Fees Order 2008, SI 2008/676 and the Immigration and Nationality (Fees) (Amendment) Regulations 2008, SI 2008/544 was that:

(i) the nature of the underlying visa or entry clearance application should be clear so that it was possible to see whether a fee was payable and whether a fee exemption might be available;

(ii) it was clear that an application for fee exemption was being made;

(iii) an evidential basis for the fee exemption was provided; and

(iv) a fee waiver power existed, even if it changed over time. If a fee exemption application was made and relevant evidence was not provided, it was to be hoped that the department would tell an applicant what at least the target of any evidence should be.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll