header-logo header-logo

The impact of GDPR (Pt 1)

22 September 2017
Issue: 6672 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Data protection
printer mail-detail
nlj_7762_carousel_morrison

Organisations that have had a ‘lackadaisical attitude’ so far to the data protection overhaul scheduled to take effect next May ‘have a lot of work to do’, lawyers have warned.

Once the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) comes into force, non-compliant organisations that commit a serious breach risk fines of up to 4% of their annual worldwide turnover for the preceding financial year or €20m (whichever is greater). The current ceiling on data protection violations is £500,000.

The GDPR will impose significant obligations on organisations that process personal data, and creates numerous challenges. These range from an obligation to demonstrate consent and the new right to be forgotten to the requirement on all public bodies to appoint a data protection officer.   

In the first of a four-part series in NLJ on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Rollits specialists David White, senior solicitor, and Tom Morrison, partner, explore why the current data protection legislation needed updating and provide an overview of some of the key changes being introduced.

Issue: 6672 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Data protection
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll