header-logo header-logo

The impact of GDPR (Pt 1)

22 September 2017
Issue: 6672 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Data protection
printer mail-detail
nlj_7762_carousel_morrison

Organisations that have had a ‘lackadaisical attitude’ so far to the data protection overhaul scheduled to take effect next May ‘have a lot of work to do’, lawyers have warned.

Once the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) comes into force, non-compliant organisations that commit a serious breach risk fines of up to 4% of their annual worldwide turnover for the preceding financial year or €20m (whichever is greater). The current ceiling on data protection violations is £500,000.

The GDPR will impose significant obligations on organisations that process personal data, and creates numerous challenges. These range from an obligation to demonstrate consent and the new right to be forgotten to the requirement on all public bodies to appoint a data protection officer.   

In the first of a four-part series in NLJ on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Rollits specialists David White, senior solicitor, and Tom Morrison, partner, explore why the current data protection legislation needed updating and provide an overview of some of the key changes being introduced.

Issue: 6672 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Data protection
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll