header-logo header-logo

20 September 2007
Issue: 7289 / Categories: Legal News , EU
printer mail-detail

Imperial measures here to stay?

News

The European Commission’s decision to not force metrication on Britain will be welcomed with open arms by the government, says Kate Edwards, a barrister at Outer Temple Chambers.

Under new proposals, EU law will be changed to allow indefinite use of imperial measures.

Says Edwards: “Metrication is a potentially expensive process for the UK government, which if enforced will be universally unpopular with industry. It is no longer on the European agenda as a priority and there is little doubt it will be quietly dropped from the political agenda at home.“

She says there has been a distinct lack of appetite among prosecuting authorities in the UK for taking metrication cases to court.
“In a 2001 test case brought by Trading Standards in Sunderland, greengrocer Steve Thoburn became the first person to be convicted under the Weights and Measures Act 1985. The Act (as amended) prohibited the use of the pound as a ‘primary indicator’ for grocers. Thoburn was found guilty of two counts of having weighing scales calibrated to imperial-only units.”

Thoburn’s appeal was dismissed because the European Communities Act 1972 could not have been impliedly repealed by the 1985 Act.

Issue: 7289 / Categories: Legal News , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll