header-logo header-logo

07 November 2019
Issue: 7863 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Animal

Electronic Collar Manufacturers Association (an unincorporated association) and another v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2019] EWHC 2813 (Admin), [2019] All ER (D) 150 (Oct)

There were aspects of the defendant Secretary of State’s approach to the introduction of a proposed ban on e-collars which were justifiably open to criticism, but she had not acted unlawfully. Accordingly, the Administrative Court dismissed the claimants’ application for judicial review of her decision to ban the use of hand-held remote-controlled e-collar devices for cats and dogs.

Costs

Travelers Insurance Company Ltd v XYZ [2019] UKSC 48, [2019] All ER (D) 190 (Oct)

A non-party costs order was imposed on the appellant (the insurer) under s 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, in respect of a group litigation brought against a company which operated medical clinics that supplied and fitted breast implants, some of which had ruptured and injured a number of claimants. The Supreme Court allowed the insurer’s appeal, holding, among other things, that, of the three elements of the insurer’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll