header-logo header-logo

30 June 2023
Issue: 8031 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 30 June 2023

Data protection

R (on the application of the3million and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and others [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin), [2023] All ER (D) 15 (Apr)

The Administrative Court ruled on the legality of statutory restrictions on data protection rights in the context of immigration control. The judicial review was a challenge to the government’s second attempt to produce an immigration exemption from the UK’s General Data Protection Regulation (the UK GDPR), which was the retained version of the EU’s GDPR (Regulation 2016/679), with certain amendments. The claimants contended that, following the first judicial review in which the government’s initial attempt to produce an immigration exemption had failed, the exemption still did not meet the requirement of being a ‘legislative measure’, necessary for compliance with Art 23 of the UK GDPR; and/or that the immigration exemption still did not comply with the mandatory requirements in Art 23(2) of the UK GDPR, because it omitted necessary substantive and procedural safeguards. The court allowed the claim, in part, ruling

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll