header-logo header-logo

30 June 2023
Issue: 8031 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 30 June 2023

Data protection

R (on the application of the3million and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and others [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin), [2023] All ER (D) 15 (Apr)

The Administrative Court ruled on the legality of statutory restrictions on data protection rights in the context of immigration control. The judicial review was a challenge to the government’s second attempt to produce an immigration exemption from the UK’s General Data Protection Regulation (the UK GDPR), which was the retained version of the EU’s GDPR (Regulation 2016/679), with certain amendments. The claimants contended that, following the first judicial review in which the government’s initial attempt to produce an immigration exemption had failed, the exemption still did not meet the requirement of being a ‘legislative measure’, necessary for compliance with Art 23 of the UK GDPR; and/or that the immigration exemption still did not comply with the mandatory requirements in Art 23(2) of the UK GDPR, because it omitted necessary substantive and procedural safeguards. The court allowed the claim, in part, ruling

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
back-to-top-scroll