header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 30 June 2023

30 June 2023
Issue: 8031 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Data protection

R (on the application of the3million and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and others [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin), [2023] All ER (D) 15 (Apr)

The Administrative Court ruled on the legality of statutory restrictions on data protection rights in the context of immigration control. The judicial review was a challenge to the government’s second attempt to produce an immigration exemption from the UK’s General Data Protection Regulation (the UK GDPR), which was the retained version of the EU’s GDPR (Regulation 2016/679), with certain amendments. The claimants contended that, following the first judicial review in which the government’s initial attempt to produce an immigration exemption had failed, the exemption still did not meet the requirement of being a ‘legislative measure’, necessary for compliance with Art 23 of the UK GDPR; and/or that the immigration exemption still did not comply with the mandatory requirements in Art 23(2) of the UK GDPR, because it omitted necessary substantive and procedural safeguards. The court allowed the claim, in part, ruling

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll