header-logo header-logo

01 March 2024 / Kate McMahon
Issue: 8061 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Fraud
printer mail-detail

In defence of private prosecutions

161595
The Post Office treated the wronged postmasters inexcusably. But let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater, argues Kate McMahon

It would be a tragic irony if, in response to the inexcusable failures of the government-owned Post Office, a legal remedy available to those wronged were to be revoked. Indeed, such an act would require lawyers and the public to put unrestrained faith in the exact same government that has failed to adequately supervise its own Post Office.

The inertia and partiality to be guarded against has been long recognised by our courts and the importance of the remedy of private prosecutions always enforced. In Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers [1978] AC 435, [1977] 3 All ER 70, Lord Wilberforce said: ‘The individual… who wishes to see the law enforced has a remedy of his own: he can bring a private prosecution. This historical right, which goes right back to the earliest days of our legal system… remains a valuable constitutional safeguard against inertia or partiality on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll