header-logo header-logo

26 May 2017
Issue: 7747 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Income tax

Jackson v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2017] UKFTT 341 (TC), [2017] All ER (D) 103 (May)

The First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (the FTT) allowed the taxpayer’s appeal against a decision of the Revenue and Customs Commissioners to the effect that he had not had a reasonable excuse for submitting a late application for enhanced protection in respect of a lifetime allowance charge pursuant to para 12 of Sch 36 to the Finance Act 2004. The FTT held that, as required by reg 12 of the Registered Pension Schemes (Enhanced Lifetime Allowance) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/131), the taxpayer had had a reasonable excuse for not giving the required notification on or after the relevant closing date, and had acted without unreasonable delay once he had discovered that no notification had been made on his behalf.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
The High Court has upheld the Metropolitan Police’s live facial recognition policy, rejecting claims that its deployment unlawfully interferes with privacy and protest rights
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
back-to-top-scroll