header-logo header-logo

27 June 2014
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Income tax

Pike v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2014] EWCA Civ 824, [2014] All ER (D) 172 (Jun)

Schedule 13 of the Finance Act 1996 did not define “interest”, nevertheless, it was possible to identify certain characteristics of an amount payable by way of interest. First, it was calculated by reference to an underlying debt. Second, it was a payment made according to time, by way of compensation for the use of money. Third, the sum payable accrued from day to day or at other periodic intervals. Fourth, whilst the payment so accrued, it did not, in order for it to be interest, have to be paid at any intervals: it was possible for interest not to become payable until the principal became payable. Fifth, what the payment was called was not determinative; the question had always to be one as to its true nature. Sixth, the fact that an interest payment might be aggregated with a payment of a different nature did not “denature” the interest payment. 

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll