header-logo header-logo

An increasing chasm

05 October 2012 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail

Patrick Allen calls for urgent investment in information technology for the civil courts’ system

The IT revolution has changed the face of legal practice over the last 30 years. We acquired our first PCs and Macs in the early 1980s. We threw away our memory typewriters and golf ball printers. Later came the Internet, e-mails, BlackBerries, iPhones, the iPad, voice recognition and the Cloud. Communications between clients, solicitors, counsel and experts have been transformed by e-mail and scanning.

The revolution stops, however, when we arrive at the court system which is largely an IT-free zone for litigants and their lawyers.

Lord Woolf in his 1996 report on the Reform of Civil Justice suggested that the proper use of IT was one of the cornerstones for the reform success. However, there was no appetite for investment by the government and there is no doubt that the government’s failure to invest in IT for the courts held back the true potential of his reforms.

Hopes dashed

There have been occasional rays of hope that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll