header-logo header-logo

05 October 2012 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail

An increasing chasm

Patrick Allen calls for urgent investment in information technology for the civil courts’ system

The IT revolution has changed the face of legal practice over the last 30 years. We acquired our first PCs and Macs in the early 1980s. We threw away our memory typewriters and golf ball printers. Later came the Internet, e-mails, BlackBerries, iPhones, the iPad, voice recognition and the Cloud. Communications between clients, solicitors, counsel and experts have been transformed by e-mail and scanning.

The revolution stops, however, when we arrive at the court system which is largely an IT-free zone for litigants and their lawyers.

Lord Woolf in his 1996 report on the Reform of Civil Justice suggested that the proper use of IT was one of the cornerstones for the reform success. However, there was no appetite for investment by the government and there is no doubt that the government’s failure to invest in IT for the courts held back the true potential of his reforms.

Hopes dashed

There have been occasional rays of hope that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll