header-logo header-logo

Inequality of arms

07 March 2019 / Jonathan Wheeler
Issue: 7831 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

That bereaved families have so little hope of obtaining legal aid for inquests is indicative of the UK’s broken system, says Jonathan Wheeler

 

With only a week to go before the opening of the inquests into the 1974 Birmingham pub bombings last month, the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) rejected the victims’ application for legal aid. Northern Ireland firm KRW Law, representing half of the families, was instead awarded only a tenth of the funding requested—certainly insufficient for the well-resourced legal team it required.

The following day, a crowdfunding page was created in a last-ditch attempt to source the funds desperately needed for the families’ legal representation. This was, however, too little too late, after a succession of snubs by LAA, and when a boycott of the inquest by the families had been floated as a serious option. The fact that the families found themselves in this situation at such a late stage is indicative of the broken legal aid system in the UK.

Exceptional cases only

The rules on legal aid representation relate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll