header-logo header-logo

Inequality of arms

07 March 2019 / Jonathan Wheeler
Issue: 7831 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

That bereaved families have so little hope of obtaining legal aid for inquests is indicative of the UK’s broken system, says Jonathan Wheeler

 

With only a week to go before the opening of the inquests into the 1974 Birmingham pub bombings last month, the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) rejected the victims’ application for legal aid. Northern Ireland firm KRW Law, representing half of the families, was instead awarded only a tenth of the funding requested—certainly insufficient for the well-resourced legal team it required.

The following day, a crowdfunding page was created in a last-ditch attempt to source the funds desperately needed for the families’ legal representation. This was, however, too little too late, after a succession of snubs by LAA, and when a boycott of the inquest by the families had been floated as a serious option. The fact that the families found themselves in this situation at such a late stage is indicative of the broken legal aid system in the UK.

Exceptional cases only

The rules on legal aid representation relate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll