header-logo header-logo

Information highway

08 December 2011 / Deborah Blaxell , Chris Dale
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Technology
printer mail-detail

Deborah Blaxell & Chris Dale trace the path of data following the instruction of a software & services provider

Lawyers and clients are often unsure about what happens when they instruct a litigation services and software provider. Marketing materials inevitably reduce the processes to headings and bullet-points using a limited vocabulary; technical specifications are just that. Neither leaves a potential buyer of services with a clear understanding of what happens once instructions are given to collect data for litigation, for responding to a regulator’s inquiry, or for internal investigations. Those facing their first case involving electronic documents may struggle to understand the concepts. These are best explained by simple descriptions of what happens from the moment instructions are given.

Taking instructions

The provider will need to understand the time-frames involved, the objectives of the project, the risks involved, the client’s budget and the resources available to assist with the project. It is very important at this stage that the provider, the client and the client’s lawyers communicate fully to ensure that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll