header-logo header-logo

08 December 2011 / Deborah Blaxell , Chris Dale
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Technology
printer mail-detail

Information highway

Deborah Blaxell & Chris Dale trace the path of data following the instruction of a software & services provider

Lawyers and clients are often unsure about what happens when they instruct a litigation services and software provider. Marketing materials inevitably reduce the processes to headings and bullet-points using a limited vocabulary; technical specifications are just that. Neither leaves a potential buyer of services with a clear understanding of what happens once instructions are given to collect data for litigation, for responding to a regulator’s inquiry, or for internal investigations. Those facing their first case involving electronic documents may struggle to understand the concepts. These are best explained by simple descriptions of what happens from the moment instructions are given.

Taking instructions

The provider will need to understand the time-frames involved, the objectives of the project, the risks involved, the client’s budget and the resources available to assist with the project. It is very important at this stage that the provider, the client and the client’s lawyers communicate fully to ensure that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll