header-logo header-logo

Information meltdown

24 May 2007
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features , Local government , Property
printer mail-detail

HIPs will be hindered by the failure to reform the local authority search market, says Mark Riddick

Local government holds the information required by conveyancers to undertake their due diligence requirements on the purchase of a property by their clients. It competes with private companies in the compilation of searches for conveyancers from that information. It is claimed that certain local authorities compete unfairly by restricting the private search companies’ access to the information.

LOCAL AUTHORITY SEARCH FEES

Local authorities can justifiably claim that they do not have the resources (funding or personnel) to cope with providing the necessary facilities to private search companies. This is because central government has set a fee for access to this information at a level that is not currently calculated to recover all of the cost of maintaining and providing the information.
The fact that the fee charged to private search companies for access is £11, and the cost of a search compiled by a local authority (the so-called “official search”) can be as much as £300, suggests that either the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll