header-logo header-logo

11 August 2011
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MoJ to keep eye on privacy injunctions

The Ministry of Justice has launched a 12-month pilot scheme to monitor applications for privacy injunctions

It will gather together and publish, in anonymised form, information about applications for injunctions where s 12 of the Human Rights Act 1998—freedom of expression—is engaged.

The Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger, has issued Practice Direction 51F, which came into force on 1 August, to provide for the scheme.

It applies to any civil proceedings in the High Court or Court of Appeal in which the court “considers an application for an injunction prohibiting the publication of private or confidential information, the continuation of such an injunction, or an appeal against the refusal of such an injunction”.

The scheme does not apply to proceedings covered by the Family Procedure Rules 2010, immigration or asylum proceedings, or proceedings which raise issues of national security.

It was originally proposed by Lord Neuberger’s super-injunction committee in May. Lord Neuberger has also published the final practice guidance for interim non-disclosure orders, which was originally published in a draft annexed to the super-injunction committee’s report.
 

Issue: 7478 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll