header-logo header-logo

Injustice clustered: a stacked system

18 February 2021 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7921 / Categories: Features , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
39817
The ‘single-issue’ approach of the legal system ensures it is stacked against the disadvantaged, says Jon Robins

Social welfare lawyers will recognise the scenario. The flustered client who arrives with their shopping bag stuffed full of unopened correspondence. Each bill reveals one more unresolved issue. Problems rarely arise singularly but, like buses, they tend to come all at once and when they do, they are overwhelming.

Legal policy wonks have a name for the phenomenon: ‘problem clusters’. Someone loses their job, they can’t afford to pay their rent or mortgage, they have problems claiming welfare benefits, etc. It has been the subject of debate in the legal aid world, and some controversial policy initiatives, since the influential 2004 study Causes of Action: Civil Law and Social Justice.

Yet lawyers, the courts and much of the administrative bureaucracy surrounding public bodies, operate on a ‘single-issue’ basis. It is that complexity, and the indifference of our legal system to it, that is the subject of a fascinating and thoughtful book

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll