header-logo header-logo

18 February 2021 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7921 / Categories: Features , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Injustice clustered: a stacked system

39817
The ‘single-issue’ approach of the legal system ensures it is stacked against the disadvantaged, says Jon Robins

Social welfare lawyers will recognise the scenario. The flustered client who arrives with their shopping bag stuffed full of unopened correspondence. Each bill reveals one more unresolved issue. Problems rarely arise singularly but, like buses, they tend to come all at once and when they do, they are overwhelming.

Legal policy wonks have a name for the phenomenon: ‘problem clusters’. Someone loses their job, they can’t afford to pay their rent or mortgage, they have problems claiming welfare benefits, etc. It has been the subject of debate in the legal aid world, and some controversial policy initiatives, since the influential 2004 study Causes of Action: Civil Law and Social Justice.

Yet lawyers, the courts and much of the administrative bureaucracy surrounding public bodies, operate on a ‘single-issue’ basis. It is that complexity, and the indifference of our legal system to it, that is the subject of a fascinating and thoughtful book

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll