header-logo header-logo

Inside out

02 September 2010 / Oliver Assersohn
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Oliver Assersohn analyses the first FSA initiated prosecution for insider trading to end in acquittal

Rv (1) McFall (2) Rimmington (3) King [2010] Southwark Crown Court is the first Financial Services Authority (FSA) initiated criminal prosecution for insider trading to end in acquittals for the defendants. The case is of interest to practitioners and traders not only because of the facts but also because some of the arguments raised may be of relevance to other cases both in a criminal and regulatory context.

The allegations

Mr King, who was finance director of Neutec Pharma Plc (a biotechnology company), was accused of disclosing insider information relating to the takeover of Neutec by Novartis to his friend, Mr McFall, who was in turn alleged to have passed that inside information to his friend, Mr Rimmington. The FSA’s case was that Mr Rimmington then traded on the basis of that inside information. Both Mr McFall and Mr Rimmington were leading City lawyers in separate firms. All three defendants consistently denied any wrongdoing.

The trial

The trial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll