header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010 / Oliver Assersohn
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Inside out

Oliver Assersohn analyses the first FSA initiated prosecution for insider trading to end in acquittal

Rv (1) McFall (2) Rimmington (3) King [2010] Southwark Crown Court is the first Financial Services Authority (FSA) initiated criminal prosecution for insider trading to end in acquittals for the defendants. The case is of interest to practitioners and traders not only because of the facts but also because some of the arguments raised may be of relevance to other cases both in a criminal and regulatory context.

The allegations

Mr King, who was finance director of Neutec Pharma Plc (a biotechnology company), was accused of disclosing insider information relating to the takeover of Neutec by Novartis to his friend, Mr McFall, who was in turn alleged to have passed that inside information to his friend, Mr Rimmington. The FSA’s case was that Mr Rimmington then traded on the basis of that inside information. Both Mr McFall and Mr Rimmington were leading City lawyers in separate firms. All three defendants consistently denied any wrongdoing.

The trial

The trial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll