header-logo header-logo

24 May 2012
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency

Trillium (Nelson) Properties Ltd v Office Metro Ltd [2012] EWHC 1191 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 98 (May)

On the true interpretation of Art 3(1) of Council Regulation (EC) (No 1346/2000), “establishment” for the purposes of insolvency proceedings had to be demonstrated at a single moment in time, namely the time when the proceedings were opened. Were it otherwise and were it capable of referring to a number of different points of time, Art 3(1) of the Regulation would be unworkable because there could be a number of main proceedings, which was contrary to the purpose of the Regulation. The relevant date for determining the existence of establishment was the date of the presentation of the petition.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

DAC Beachcroft—Kirstie Pike & Simy Khanna

DAC Beachcroft—Kirstie Pike & Simy Khanna

DAC Beachcroft further builds national Professional Liability practice, hiring two partners in Bristol

NEWS
A child’s views can be taken into account during international child abduction proceedings, the Supreme Court has held
Small and medium-sized law firms have urged regulators to pause plans to exclude owner-managers from compliance officer roles
Lawyers have raised the alarm on employment tribunal delays and backlogs, with some cases facing a three-year wait for a hearing
The controversial assisted dying Bill has drawn to a halt after MPs defeated it by 286 votes to 270
MPs have called for legislation to protect against the human rights risks of artificial intelligence (AI)
back-to-top-scroll