header-logo header-logo

17 May 2013
Issue: 7560 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency—Jurisdiction—Agreement of parties

HSBC Bank v Tambrook Jersey Ltd [2013] EWHC 866 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 116 (Apr)
 

Chancery Division, Mann J, 12 Apr 2013

In order for an English court to provide “assistance” to a foreign court under s 426(4) of the Insolvency Act 1986, there have to be existing or future intended insolvency proceedings in that other court.

Stephen Robins (instructed by CMS Cameron McKenna) for the bank.

The claimant company was registered in Jersey. Its centre of main interests was in Jersey, but its main business activity was in England. It borrowed more than £6m for the defendant bank in order to purchase and develop property in England. That venture was a major failure, and the bank became the defendant’s main creditor.

The director of the claimant and the bank arranged for sale of the property to occur, but considered it appropriate that a form of insolvency procedure occur before sale. It was not considered that Jersey insolvency proceedings would be appropriate, as the only available Jersey procedure, known as “Desastre”,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll