header-logo header-logo

17 May 2013
Issue: 7560 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency—Jurisdiction—Agreement of parties

HSBC Bank v Tambrook Jersey Ltd [2013] EWHC 866 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 116 (Apr)
 

Chancery Division, Mann J, 12 Apr 2013

In order for an English court to provide “assistance” to a foreign court under s 426(4) of the Insolvency Act 1986, there have to be existing or future intended insolvency proceedings in that other court.

Stephen Robins (instructed by CMS Cameron McKenna) for the bank.

The claimant company was registered in Jersey. Its centre of main interests was in Jersey, but its main business activity was in England. It borrowed more than £6m for the defendant bank in order to purchase and develop property in England. That venture was a major failure, and the bank became the defendant’s main creditor.

The director of the claimant and the bank arranged for sale of the property to occur, but considered it appropriate that a form of insolvency procedure occur before sale. It was not considered that Jersey insolvency proceedings would be appropriate, as the only available Jersey procedure, known as “Desastre”,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll